Hi!
Thanks for subroutine $a845 - which sets bank to Bitte melde dich an, um diesen Link zu sehen.
Only call this in BASIC extension and writting to 80col mode is allowed and disk access is correctly!
Thanks to WTE
Miro
Hi!
Thanks for subroutine $a845 - which sets bank to Bitte melde dich an, um diesen Link zu sehen.
Only call this in BASIC extension and writting to 80col mode is allowed and disk access is correctly!
Thanks to WTE
Miro
Hi!
Yes I know how to write to VDC, but I didn't knew that if I do BASIC extension some subroutines changes BANK.
As you could see, first what I do in INIT is switching bank to Bitte melde dich an, um diesen Link zu sehen.. But never knew that in progress can be changed.
So, I want ask you: before every writting to screen I must call $a845 ?
And also: you're advanced user, separately (not as BASIC extension) my I/O operation works (like: DIR, FORMAT...), but when I activate extension, works not.
So my Q is that what to call/change for I/O operations. If needs st. to write before disk access.
Thank you very very much.
Miro
Hi Tommy!
I attached the small code EXTENSION.PRG
It's:
1300 - INIT CODE
1320 - DATA (text)
1600 - MAIN LOPP (searching my command prefix "@")
1630 - MY COMMANDS TESTING
16ba - PROMPT
Thank you very much!
Miro
Hi!
I know it's new thread, but I began programming my program again... it's BASIC 7 extension to disk access commands.
and first function is prompt.
The same problem:
- when I want to print prompt, properly working only in 40col mode (illogical not?), it's used routine $FFD2...
- when I start it separated all is correctly in 40col also 80col mode
I'm afraid that my routines to disk access will work not...
So, what can disable printing in 80col mode when I use BASIC extension? I don't know really what...
> and: it's first ML program which I'm programming on Commodore 128 (before only Commodore 64) - I let go away KickAssembler 'cause it produces the same problems. So I tried to write it in C128 ML MONITOR. It's hard work, but I think that can help when KickAssembler does problems. But I'm sad that direct programming does the same...
Thanks for every reply.
Miro